Protecting wildlife for our children's future
National Wildlife Federation logo Photos of wildlife
Larry Schweiger's View Photo of bald eagle

« No Ice in the Arctic | Home | Scientists Report Overwhelming Evidence »

National Wildlife Federation Welcomes President’s Thaw on Global Warming

National Wildlife Federation welcomes President Bush’s shift on global warming, which was announced by the White House this afternoon in anticipation of the President’s State of the Union remarks tonight.

As the global warming issue heats up across America, the President's position on global warming is beginning to thaw.

The White House today for the first time said it would work to halt the growth of U.S. global warming pollution from oil, which stands in stark contrast to the president’s five-year old policy of allowing pollution levels to increase indefinitely. While the shift is a step in the right direction, the President’s policy proposals do not measure up to the urgency of the global warming threat to the future of America’s security, wildlife and economy.

The president has dipped a few oars in the water, but he has not fully turned the ship to the right destination. We need to be cutting global warming pollution from gasoline and all other energy sources, and we need to start now with a mandatory program that guarantees results. We need to set goals to cut emissions from all sources, including automobiles, by 20 percent over the next decade. The president’s plan is neither comprehensive nor adequate.

The White House announced today that the president tonight will proclaim ‘the goal of reducing U.S. gasoline usage by 20 percent in the next ten years.’ According to the White House announcement, ‘The president's plan will help confront climate change by stopping the projected growth of carbon dioxide emissions from cars, light trucks, and SUVs within 10 years.’ America’s dependency on oil currently accounts for about 40 percent of U.S. emissions or carbon dioxide, the pollutant most responsible for global warming. The Department of Energy recently projected that carbon dioxide emissions from oil will grow by 11 percent over the next 10 years and by 29 percent by the year 2030 without action.

The new energy goals cast a puzzling shadow on the Bush Administration’s tactics just last week. President Bush opposed the just-passed House bill to shift billions of dollars of oil subsidies to alternative energy sources. We hope that the overwhelming bipartisan support for that bill, which passed 264 to 163, was a wakeup call for the president. A key question for the president now is whether he will reverse his position as that bill moves through the Senate.

The new White House plan calls once again for opening up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for drilling, which will sacrifice one of America’s great unspoiled areas. President Bush isn’t listening to the millions of Americans who understand we cannot meet our energy needs by forever spoiling our wild places. Moving to new clean energy alternatives is the only long-term solution to the problem.

We look forward to working on a bipartisan basis in the new Congress to advance effective global warming policies, and to work with the Bush Administration where we have common ground. Recent polls demonstrate that the vast majority of Americans believe global warming is a serious threat and they want our government to act. Leaders in Congress have already announced their intention to move much more aggressively on global warming with binding measures to broadly curb global warming pollution, and the National Wildlife Federation will be assisting those efforts as our top priority.

Comments

Timothy Colman

Dear Larry,

Clean energy solutions start with the low tech and free efforts of everyone putting a sweater on in winter and walking around in their Speedo's in the summer.

Well -- maybe a speedo and a long t shirt for some of us.

But Conservation of energy -- just using less stuff has to be the war footing for climate crisis.

And as someone who has a kid, I am worried about her future. I don't think we really comprehend the problems with the change in the climate.

I read in the NYT Science section yesterday about FWS agency efforts to triage species relocation. This means picking uip a species and moving it elsewhere to promote its survival -- like we did so well in Yellowstone with the wolves.

I think if we are at that point then we've lost.

We shouldn't make undeveloped wild habitats become the national sacrifice areas.

There are good green jobs in changing our energy stream and conservation.

There are great health benefits to clean water and no more auto exhaust in our air.

And there is a great opportunity to improve our ecological literacy -- to learn about native plants, animals that we share our habitat with across this great country.

I just don't think you're going to see Congress doing much until cities like Seattle have imposed toll roads to reduce traffic and cut carbon exhaust from cars.

There is too much money in the Exxon Mobil status quo for even Democrats to shift.

I think we have to come up with city, county, watershed level conservation goals that are far more ambitious that what I've seen to date.

Finally -- there is an excellent conference coming up on the Climate Crisis and how to design a greener path. I will be participating in Seattle, and encourage friends and kindred spirits to join in The Ecological Imperative 2010
http://www.2010imperative.org/2010_imperative.html

Thanks for your efforts.

best fishes,

Timothy Colman
Good Nature Publishing Co
Seattle WA

Sarah Jonhson

I think president bush needs to think bout the people more than the war and i think he is a really bad person on the inside and out.

-Sarah

Taylor McWilliams

Dear Larry,

I think the decreasing Polar Bear population is a real bummer. Living in Alaska, I have seen many... it would be sad to see them all leave. You should try to do something about it instead of sitting on this website all day.

As for 'Sarah', I agree with you. President Bush should spend more money on solving Global Warming, and spend less money on sending(killing) troops to Iraq! We already have enough (including my brother!). It seems like you're just making an excuse to kill off more Americans... tsk tsk.... shame on you.... Anyway, that's all I have to say.

-Dr. Taylor McWilliams of Juneau, Alaska

me

yo foolius maximus

HockeyLady

Your strong stand on Global Warming is too left for me--am not renewing membership.

Mariah Langford

I hate this website..it talks to much about the problems and not enough about what we can do to stop them,I say get started on stuff to fix the problems and thats all I have to say..


- Mariah

Liz Fairchild

I think your article was great and it had many strong points to it! Keep up the good work! I believe that something can really be done about Global Warming!

Lianabelle Berg

Das globale Wärmen ist solch eine schlechte Zeitverschwendung. Du solltest deine Web site wirklich verbessern.

Mr. Carl Roderick Seemes

Ah, Global Warming... A subject that often comes up in discussion. Ecspecially in the college classroom. I truly believe that it is an issue but I also believe that it can be prevented. So why not start now before it's too late? Thanks.

-C.R.S.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.



Last chance

Attend a "Last Chance: Preserving Life on Earth" Event
Donate today
The wilderness isn't just out there. It's near you. It's that wild place you cherish and the wildlife that make it special What can you do to protect it? Support NWF.


Subscribe to this blog
Stay on top of the latest updates by adding this blog to your newsreader or web portal. Subscribe Now.



© 1996- National Wildlife Federation | 11100 Wildlife Center Dr, Reston VA 20190 | 800-822-9919
Contact Us | Jobs at NWF | Link to NWF | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use